Leadership alignment
Succession risk surfaced without disrupting senior team
Financial Services · Established
The challenge
The founding CEO was planning to step back from day-to-day operations over an 18-month period. The board needed an honest assessment of whether the existing leadership team could absorb the transition without disruption, but could not risk a formal succession discussion that might unsettle high-performing individuals before a process had been agreed.
What Wexler Gray surfaced
Parallel assessment revealed that three of the four direct reports to the CEO were assessed as strong individual contributors but rated poorly on the strategic leadership dimensions — capable of managing their functions but not yet ready to hold collective accountability for the business
The COO, identified by the board as the most likely internal successor, received the highest individual score (74) but operators noted significant gaps in external relationship management and board-level communication — skills the founding CEO provided centrally
Bearing interpretation framed the finding as a "thin bench" problem rather than a succession crisis: the company had the raw material for a strong successor cohort but needed 12 to 18 months of deliberate development investment before an internal transition would be credible
Outcome
The board approved a structured leadership development program for the top four direct reports, with the COO given expanded board exposure through a non-executive committee assignment. The founding CEO extended their active involvement by 12 months, consistent with the Bearing recommendation. The transition completed without loss of any senior leadership.
Engagement brief
Request the full engagement brief.
Available to PE operating teams and portfolio company leadership. The brief covers methodology, operator composition, and the full assessment output.